Okay, so if you read my "review" of the Core i9-9900KS and your jimmies became entangled, here's a more, um, serious(?) one. By the way, I didn't actually get a i9-9900KS but I don't need one to review it, or know how it performs. So I just looked around and made my own graph based on numbers from major review sites.
This graph demonstrates just how much AMD's Ryzen Lineup Has Been Left Behind by the new Core i9-9900KS, and how Intel Has Extended It's Lead Over AMD. It also shows that if you want Bleeding Edge Performance you should definitely Pay More Money For The Core i9-9900KS.
Also, Ryzen sucks for gaming. (it's an old one, but it checks out).
In case you didn't notice, like my other "Review", this is satirical. That said, this one is a bit more serious because the above graph is based on accurate data, and is presented in a way I feel is analogous with how people are praising the i9-9900KS for gaming.